[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608110132.GA296162@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 13:01:32 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
Qiang Zhang <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Kyungtae Kim <kt0755@...il.com>
Subject: Re: usb: gadget: function: printer: Fix use-after-free in
__lock_acquire()
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:55:13PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I don't need to add Fix tag to view the code.
>
> I have got understanding difficulties for this kind of feedback.
> How much do you care for corresponding patch review concerns?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=af7b4801030c07637840191c69eb666917e4135d#n183
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review
comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list.
I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother
developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with
comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not needed
to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability
to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists