[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608105929.GA24487@OptiPlex>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 18:59:29 +0800
From: Geliang Tang <geliangtang@...il.com>
To: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>
Cc: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@...ux.intel.com>,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Krystad <peter.krystad@...ux.intel.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mptcp: bugfix for RM_ADDR option parsing
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:10:23PM +0200, Matthieu Baerts wrote:
> Hi Geliang,
>
> On 08/06/2020 09:48, Geliang Tang wrote:
> > In MPTCPOPT_RM_ADDR option parsing, the pointer "ptr" pointed to the
> > "Subtype" octet, the pointer "ptr+1" pointed to the "Address ID" octet:
> >
> > +-------+-------+---------------+
> > |Subtype|(resvd)| Address ID |
> > +-------+-------+---------------+
> > | |
> > ptr ptr+1
> >
> > We should set mp_opt->rm_id to the value of "ptr+1", not "ptr". This patch
> > will fix this bug.
>
> Thank you for the patch, good catch!
> Indeed "ptr" should be incremented.
>
> Because this is a bug-fix for net, may you clearly indicate that in the
> subject to help -net maintainers please? [PATCH net v2]
>
> Also, may you add a "Fixes" tag as well as it is for -net ? I guess it
> should be:
>
> Fixes: 3df523ab582c ("mptcp: Add ADD_ADDR handling")
>
> The rest is good!
>
> Cheers,
> Matt
> --
> Matthieu Baerts | R&D Engineer
> matthieu.baerts@...sares.net
> Tessares SA | Hybrid Access Solutions
> www.tessares.net
> 1 Avenue Jean Monnet, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your reply.
I have already resend patch v2 to you.
-Geliang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists