[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608130734.GB200855@google.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:07:34 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>,
Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add F2FS_IOC_TRIM_FILE ioctl
On 06/08, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/6/8 15:19, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > Yes, I agree with you about each vendor has different implementation on discard.
> > So, we might be gonna use the combination of zeroing and send discards
> > for a more
> > secure solution. :)
>
> IIRC, current solution is:
>
> - pin file
> - get all block addresses of file
> - write zero to block addresses
> - issue discard
>
> Is that correct?
>
> Could we handle those logic (zero out & discard) in new interface
> (may be named as {F2FS,EXT4}_IOC_SEC_TRIM_FILE)? then userspace logic
> could be quite simple later, and also memcpy could be avoid to make
> destruction process more efficient.
What about adding a flag to determine calling unmap and/or zero out?
>
> Just raw proposal. :)
>
> Thanks,
>
> > I think we still need a discard interface to unmap from the mapping
> > table of the storage device side.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > 2020년 6월 8일 (월) 오후 3:57, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>님이 작성:
> >>
> >> On 2020/6/8 11:36, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>> Yes, this is for security key destruction.
> >>>
> >>> AFAIK, discard will unmap the data block and, after done it,
> >>> we can read either zero data or garbage data from that block depending
> >>> on eMMC/UFS.
> >>
> >> Since spec didn't restrict how vendor implement the erase interface, so
> >> in order to enhance performance of discard interface, vendor could implement
> >> it as an async one, which may not zero mapping entry(L1 table), instead, it
> >> could set related bitmap to invalid that mapping entry, than later if device
> >> allow user to access that invalid mapping entry, key info may be explosed,
> >>
> >> It's completely up to how vendor implement the interface, so I think there is
> >> still risk to use discard.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> In a view point of read data, it might be the same with zeroing the data block.
> >>> However, since we can even unmap that block, I believe discard is
> >>> safer than zeroing out.
> >>>
> >>> 2020년 6월 8일 (월) 오전 11:46, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>님이 작성:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2020/6/5 12:27, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> >>>>> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Added a new ioctl to send discard commands to whole data area of
> >>>>> a regular file for security reason.
> >>>>
> >>>> I guess this interface is introduced for security key destruction, if I'm
> >>>> right, however, IIRC, discard(erase) semantics in eMMC/UFS spec won't
> >>>> guarantee that data which was discard could be zeroed out, so after discard,
> >>>> the key still have risk of exposure. So instead, should we use sb_issue_zeroout()?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> >>>>> fs/f2fs/file.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> index c812fb8e2d9c..9ae81d0fefa0 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>>> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
> >>>>> _IOR(F2FS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 18, __u64)
> >>>>> #define F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS \
> >>>>> _IOR(F2FS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 19, __u64)
> >>>>> +#define F2FS_IOC_TRIM_FILE _IO(F2FS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 20)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> #define F2FS_IOC_GET_VOLUME_NAME FS_IOC_GETFSLABEL
> >>>>> #define F2FS_IOC_SET_VOLUME_NAME FS_IOC_SETFSLABEL
> >>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> index dfa1ac2d751a..58507bb5649c 100644
> >>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> >>>>> @@ -3749,6 +3749,132 @@ static int f2fs_reserve_compress_blocks(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>> return ret;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +static int f2fs_trim_file(struct file *filp)
> >>>>> +{
> >>>>> + struct inode *inode = file_inode(filp);
> >>>>> + struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi = F2FS_I_SB(inode);
> >>>>> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> >>>>> + struct bio *bio = NULL;
> >>>>> + struct block_device *prev_bdev = NULL;
> >>>>> + loff_t file_size;
> >>>>> + pgoff_t index, pg_start = 0, pg_end;
> >>>>> + block_t prev_block = 0, len = 0;
> >>>>> + int ret = 0;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (!f2fs_hw_support_discard(sbi))
> >>>>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode) || f2fs_is_atomic_file(inode) ||
> >>>>> + f2fs_compressed_file(inode))
> >>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb))
> >>>>> + return -EROFS;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + inode_lock(inode);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + file_size = i_size_read(inode);
> >>>>> + if (!file_size)
> >>>>> + goto err;
> >>>>> + pg_end = (pgoff_t)round_up(file_size, PAGE_SIZE) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + ret = f2fs_convert_inline_inode(inode);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + goto err;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> >>>>> + down_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait(mapping);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + truncate_inode_pages(mapping, 0);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + for (index = pg_start; index < pg_end;) {
> >>>>> + struct dnode_of_data dn;
> >>>>> + unsigned int end_offset;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + set_new_dnode(&dn, inode, NULL, NULL, 0);
> >>>>> + ret = f2fs_get_dnode_of_data(&dn, index, LOOKUP_NODE);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + end_offset = ADDRS_PER_PAGE(dn.node_page, inode);
> >>>>> + if (pg_end < end_offset + index)
> >>>>> + end_offset = pg_end - index;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + for (; dn.ofs_in_node < end_offset;
> >>>>> + dn.ofs_in_node++, index++) {
> >>>>> + struct block_device *cur_bdev;
> >>>>> + block_t blkaddr = f2fs_data_blkaddr(&dn);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (__is_valid_data_blkaddr(blkaddr)) {
> >>>>> + if (!f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(F2FS_I_SB(inode),
> >>>>> + blkaddr, DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE)) {
> >>>>> + ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + } else
> >>>>> + continue;
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + cur_bdev = f2fs_target_device(sbi, blkaddr, NULL);
> >>>>> + if (f2fs_is_multi_device(sbi)) {
> >>>>> + int i = f2fs_target_device_index(sbi, blkaddr);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + blkaddr -= FDEV(i).start_blk;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (len) {
> >>>>> + if (prev_bdev == cur_bdev &&
> >>>>> + blkaddr == prev_block + len) {
> >>>>> + len++;
> >>>>> + } else {
> >>>>> + ret = __blkdev_issue_discard(prev_bdev,
> >>>>> + SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(prev_block),
> >>>>> + SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
> >>>>> + GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
> >>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>> + goto out;
> >>>>> +> + len = 0;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (!len) {
> >>>>> + prev_bdev = cur_bdev;
> >>>>> + prev_block = blkaddr;
> >>>>> + len = 1;
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + f2fs_put_dnode(&dn);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + if (len)
> >>>>> + ret = __blkdev_issue_discard(prev_bdev,
> >>>>> + SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(prev_block),
> >>>>> + SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
> >>>>> + GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
> >>>>> +out:
> >>>>> + if (bio) {
> >>>>> + ret = submit_bio_wait(bio);
> >>>>> + bio_put(bio);
> >>>>> + }
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_mmap_sem);
> >>>>> + up_write(&F2FS_I(inode)->i_gc_rwsem[WRITE]);
> >>>>> +err:
> >>>>> + inode_unlock(inode);
> >>>>> + mnt_drop_write_file(filp);
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>> +}
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> long f2fs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>> {
> >>>>> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(F2FS_I_SB(file_inode(filp)))))
> >>>>> @@ -3835,6 +3961,8 @@ long f2fs_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>> return f2fs_release_compress_blocks(filp, arg);
> >>>>> case F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS:
> >>>>> return f2fs_reserve_compress_blocks(filp, arg);
> >>>>> + case F2FS_IOC_TRIM_FILE:
> >>>>> + return f2fs_trim_file(filp);
> >>>>> default:
> >>>>> return -ENOTTY;
> >>>>> }
> >>>>> @@ -4004,6 +4132,7 @@ long f2fs_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> >>>>> case F2FS_IOC_GET_COMPRESS_BLOCKS:
> >>>>> case F2FS_IOC_RELEASE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS:
> >>>>> case F2FS_IOC_RESERVE_COMPRESS_BLOCKS:
> >>>>> + case F2FS_IOC_TRIM_FILE:
> >>>>> break;
> >>>>> default:
> >>>>> return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> >>>>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists