linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] remove work.func

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18e05c85-a626-82a9-b60e-d24d1c40682e@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Jun 2020 21:14:01 +0300
From:   Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To:     io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Xiaoguang Wang <xiaoguang.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] remove work.func

On 08/06/2020 21:08, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> As discussed, removing ->func from io_wq_work and moving
> it into io-wq.

Xiaoguang Wang, until Jens goes back and picks this up, I'll
also keep the patchset in my github [1]. Just in case you'd
want to play with it.

https://github.com/isilence/linux/commits/rem_work_func

> 
> Pavel Begunkov (4):
>   io_uring: don't derive close state from ->func
>   io_uring: remove custom ->func handlers
>   io_uring: don't arm a timeout through work.func
>   io_wq: add per-wq work handler instead of per work
> 
>  fs/io-wq.c    |  10 ++-
>  fs/io-wq.h    |   7 +-
>  fs/io_uring.c | 221 +++++++++++++++-----------------------------------
>  3 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 164 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Pavel Begunkov