[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200608192828.GB987@lca.pw>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 15:28:28 -0400
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, LKP <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
"Linus, Torvalds," <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 0887a7ebc9 ("ubsan: add trap instrumentation option"): BUG:
kernel hang in early-boot stage, last printk: early console in setup code
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 12:00:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:04:08PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > The issue seems due to the lack of "-fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error" in clang.
>
> Hm? No, that's supported in Clang (at least as far back as Clang 9.)
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > 0day kernel testing robot got the below dmesg and the first bad commit is
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> >
> > commit 0887a7ebc97770c7870abf3075a2e8cd502a7f52
> > Author: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> > AuthorDate: Mon Apr 6 20:12:27 2020 -0700
> > Commit: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > CommitDate: Tue Apr 7 10:43:44 2020 -0700
> >
> > ubsan: add trap instrumentation option
>
> In the randconfig, I see CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP is enabled with lots of other
> UBSAN options. If you're not expecting the results, it's very likely the
> false positives in UBSAN are going to do bad things. :) This is "working
> as expected", as noted in the commit log quoted below.
>
> >
> > Patch series "ubsan: Split out bounds checker", v5.
> >
> > This splits out the bounds checker so it can be individually used. This
> > is enabled in Android and hopefully for syzbot. Includes LKDTM tests for
> > behavioral corner-cases (beyond just the bounds checker), and adjusts
> > ubsan and kasan slightly for correct panic handling.
> >
> > This patch (of 6):
> >
> > The Undefined Behavior Sanitizer can operate in two modes: warning
> > reporting mode via lib/ubsan.c handler calls, or trap mode, which uses
> > __builtin_trap() as the handler. Using lib/ubsan.c means the kernel image
> > is about 5% larger (due to all the debugging text and reporting structures
> > to capture details about the warning conditions). Using the trap mode,
> > the image size changes are much smaller, though at the loss of the
> > "warning only" mode.
> >
> > In order to give greater flexibility to system builders that want minimal
> > changes to image size and are prepared to deal with kernel code being
> > aborted and potentially destabilizing the system, this introduces
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP. The resulting image sizes comparison:
> >
> > text data bss dec hex filename
> > 19533663 6183037 18554956 44271656 2a38828 vmlinux.stock
> > 19991849 7618513 18874448 46484810 2c54d4a vmlinux.ubsan
> > 19712181 6284181 18366540 44362902 2a4ec96 vmlinux.ubsan-trap
> >
> > CONFIG_UBSAN=y: image +4.8% (text +2.3%, data +18.9%)
> > CONFIG_UBSAN_TRAP=y: image +0.2% (text +0.9%, data +1.6%)
> >
> > Additionally adjusts the CONFIG_UBSAN Kconfig help for clarity and removes
> > the mention of non-existing boot param "ubsan_handle".
>
> If you're trying to _boot_ a randconfig, I suspect there are going to be
> a lot of surprises with UBSAN (in any mode) enabled. Right now, likely the
> least noisy of them all is UBSAN_BOUNDS, which was split out for fuzzers.
>
> FWIW, the dmesg appears to be catching a NULL pointer dereference
> (enabled via CONFIG_UBSAN_MISC):
>
> [ 0.047646] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c:459:37
> [ 0.047650] member access within null pointer of type 'struct acpi_table_fadt'
> [ 0.047655] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.6.0-11597-g7baf219982281 #1
> [ 0.047659] Call Trace:
> [ 0.047676] dump_stack+0x88/0xb9
> [ 0.047684] ? ubsan_prologue+0x21/0x46
> [ 0.047689] ? ubsan_type_mismatch_common+0x188/0x19e
> [ 0.047695] ? __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1+0x45/0x4a
> [ 0.047701] ? acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0xaa/0x435
> [ 0.047706] ? acpi_tb_parse_fadt+0x54/0xd4
> [ 0.047712] ? acpi_tb_parse_root_table+0x192/0x1bf
> [ 0.047717] ? acpi_table_init+0x3b/0x56
> [ 0.047721] ? acpi_boot_table_init+0xf/0x6e
> [ 0.047726] ? setup_arch+0x459/0x520
> [ 0.047732] ? start_kernel+0x5e/0x3ba
> [ 0.047737] ? secondary_startup_64+0xa4/0xb0
>
> I'm not sure how ACPI defines acpi_gbl_FADT though? There's no
> dereference...
>
> 459: if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.length <= ACPI_FADT_V2_SIZE) {
>
>
> BTW, this report only contained 1 actual dmesg. There were two files with
> dmesg file names, but one of them was the gzipped reproduction steps again.
No, it does not complain about a NULL pointer dereference but rather a
member access within NULL pointer.
# ./scripts/faddr2line vmlinux acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x104/0x6ec
acpi_tb_create_local_fadt+0x104/0x6ec:
acpi_tb_convert_fadt at drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c:459
(inlined by) acpi_tb_create_local_fadt at drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c:388
Clang would report several of those,
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA6078C3-3489-40E4-B756-A0AF6DB3A3A5@lca.pw/
There are many examples how to "fix" those.
$ git log --oneline --grep='member access within null pointer'
Anyway, this line,
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.length <= ACPI_FADT_V2_SIZE) {
acpi_gbl_FADT was defined in,
.//include/acpi/acpixf.h:266:ACPI_GLOBAL(struct acpi_table_fadt, acpi_gbl_FADT);
#ifdef DEFINE_ACPI_GLOBALS
#define ACPI_GLOBAL(type,name) \
extern type name; \
type name
#define ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(type,name,value) \
type name=value
#else
#ifndef ACPI_GLOBAL
#define ACPI_GLOBAL(type,name) \
extern type name
#endif
#ifndef ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL
#define ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(type,name,value) \
extern type name
#endif
#endif
Powered by blists - more mailing lists