linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/17] drivers: infiniband: Fix trivial spelling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 9 Jun 2020 17:04:02 +0100
From:   Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
To:     Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Cc:     linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@...el.com>,
        Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
        Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
        "open list:HFI1 DRIVER" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/17] drivers: infiniband: Fix trivial spelling

Ooops,

Looks like that should have been part of patch 2/17.

Must have got split during the rebase I made or something, not sure.

On 09/06/2020 16:54, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 6/9/2020 8:46 AM, Kieran Bingham wrote:
>> The word 'descriptor' is misspelled throughout the tree.
>>
>> Fix it up accordingly:
>>      decriptors -> descriptors
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> index 883cb9d48022..175290c56db9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/ipoib_tx.c
>> @@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ static struct ipoib_txreq
>> *hfi1_ipoib_send_dma_common(struct net_device *dev,
>>       if (unlikely(!tx))
>>           return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>>   -    /* so that we can test if the sdma decriptors are there */
>> +    /* so that we can test if the sdma descriptors are there */
>>       tx->txreq.num_desc = 0;
>>       tx->priv = priv;
>>       tx->txq = txp->txq;
>>
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Acked-by: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>

Thanks.

Kieran