linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers: reset: simple: add BCM6345 reset support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:06:24 +0200
From:   Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, jonas.gorski@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] drivers: reset: simple: add BCM6345 reset support

Hi Florian,

> El 10 jun 2020, a las 3:05, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com> escribió:
> 
> 
> 
> On 6/9/2020 9:02 AM, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> Add support for resetting blocks through the Linux reset controller
>> subsystem for BCM63xx SoCs.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> 
> This looks good to me, however in v1 there was a need for sleeping after
> the reset assertion, and this does not appear to be taken care of by
> default by reset-simple.c, did you determine the delay not to be necessary?

Let me do some more tests to determine if it’s really needed.

> -- 
> Florian