[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200610082040.GB14118@zn.tnic>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:20:40 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
tony.luck@...el.com, mchehab@...nel.org, james.morse@....com,
rrichter@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC, {skx,i10nm}: Advice mcelog that the error were
handled
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 02:58:01PM +0800, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
> If one MCE error has been processed in kernel, it's not necessory
> to pass it to user level mcelog.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/edac/skx_common.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/skx_common.c b/drivers/edac/skx_common.c
> index 46be1a7..8c0165b 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/skx_common.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/skx_common.c
> @@ -615,7 +615,8 @@ int skx_mce_check_error(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val,
>
> skx_mce_output_error(mci, mce, &res);
>
> - return NOTIFY_DONE;
> + /* Advice mcelog that the error were handled */
> + return NOTIFY_STOP;
> }
>
> void skx_remove(void)
> --
No, we won't be doing that anymore. See here:
https://git.kernel.org/tip/23ba710a0864108910c7531dc4c73ef65eca5568
it should appear mainline soon-ish, I hope.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists