lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200611085710.GV2428291@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:57:10 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To:     "Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, balbi@...nel.org,
        p.zabel@...gutronix.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
        robh@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, cheol.yong.kim@...el.com,
        qi-ming.wu@...el.com, yin1.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: phy: Add USB3 PHY support for Intel LGM SoC

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:36:29PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> On 11/6/2020 4:12 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:12:46AM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> > > From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>

...

> > > +	ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctrl1, val, val & SRAM_INIT_DONE,
> > > +				 10, 10 * 1000);
> exceeds more than 80 characters, so checkpatch throws warnings, to avoid
> that move to next line.

> > On one line easier to read.

It's 82 characters. It's fine.

> > > +	if (ret) {
> > > +		dev_err(ta->phy.dev, "SRAM init failed, 0x%x\n", val);
> > > +		return ret;
> > > +	}

...

> > > +	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > Assignment is redundant.
> so you mean , should be declared as
> int ret;
> right?

Right.

...

> > > +		dev_info(ta->phy.dev, "connected%s\n",
> > > +			 flipped ? " flipped" : "");
> > 
> > One line.
> exceeds more than 80 characters, so checkpatch throw warnings, to avoid that
> moved to next line.

It's fine to have on one line.

And by the way, try new checkpatch.


-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ