[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a984302-ff01-e326-d338-e50e1f532cd9@perex.cz>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 11:09:47 +0200
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, broonie@...nel.org,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
tiwai@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ALSA: compress: Fix gapless playback state machine
Dne 11. 06. 20 v 10:46 Charles Keepax napsal(a):
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 04:28:20PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> On 10-06-20, 12:40, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
>>> Dne 10. 06. 20 v 12:07 Srinivas Kandagatla napsal(a):
>>>> For gapless playback call to snd_compr_drain_notify() after
>>>> partial drain should put the state to SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING
>>>> rather than SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP as the driver is ready to
>>>> process the buffers for new track.
>>>>
>>>> With existing code, if we are playing 3 tracks in gapless, after
>>>> partial drain finished on previous track 1 the state is set to
>>>> SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP which is then moved to SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED
>>>> after data write. With this state calls to snd_compr_next_track() and
>>>> few other calls will fail as they expect the state to be in
>>>> SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the sequence of events and state transitions:
>>>>
>>>> 1. set_params (Track 1), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP
>>>> 2. set_metadata (Track 1), no state change, state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP
>>>> 3. fill and trigger start (Track 1), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING
>>>> 4. set_next_track (Track 2), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING
>>>> 5. partial_drain (Track 1), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP
>>>> 6 snd_compr_drain_notify (Track 1), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP
>>>> 7. fill data (Track 2), state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED
>>>> 8. set_metadata (Track 3), no state change, state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED
>>>> 9. set_next_track (Track 3), !! FAILURE as state != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING
>>>
>>>
>>> The snd_compr_drain_notify() is called only from snd_compr_stop(). Something
>>> is missing in this sequence?
>>
>> It is supposed to be invoked by driver when partial drain is complete..
>> both intel and sprd driver are calling this. snd_compr_stop is stop
>> while draining case so legit
>>
>
> Not sure I follow this statement, could you elaborate a bit?
> snd_compr_stop putting the state to RUNNING seems fundamentally
> broken to me, the whole point of snd_compr_stop is to take the
> state out of RUNNING.
Yes. I agree. It seems that the acknowledge for the partial drain should be
handled differently.
Jaroslav
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
--
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>
Linux Sound Maintainer; ALSA Project; Red Hat, Inc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists