[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1591872811.5140.41.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2020 06:53:31 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ima] 8eb613c0b8: stress-ng.icache.ops_per_sec -84.2%
regression
On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 15:10 +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
> On 6/10/2020 9:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> ucode: 0x500002c
> >
> > Does the following change resolve it?
> >
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > index c44414a7f82e..78e1dfc8a3f2 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> > @@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot)
> > int pcr;
> >
> > /* Is mprotect making an mmap'ed file executable? */
> > - if (!vma->vm_file || !(prot & PROT_EXEC) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
> > + if (!(ima_policy_flag & IMA_APPRAISE) || !vma->vm_file ||
> > + !(prot & PROT_EXEC) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
> > return 0;
> >
> > security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
> >
> Thanks. I test the change, it can resolve the regression.
Thanks! Can I get your "Tested-by" tag?
Mimi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists