[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d5b6a48b-005c-e5cb-a82f-5f7225741100@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 08:39:08 +0800
From: Xing Zhengjun <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Cc: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, lkp@...ts.01.org
Subject: Re: [LKP] [ima] 8eb613c0b8: stress-ng.icache.ops_per_sec -84.2%
regression
On 6/11/2020 6:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-06-11 at 15:10 +0800, Xing Zhengjun wrote:
>> On 6/10/2020 9:53 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
>> ucode: 0x500002c
>>>
>>> Does the following change resolve it?
>>>
>>> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>>> index c44414a7f82e..78e1dfc8a3f2 100644
>>> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>>> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
>>> @@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ int ima_file_mprotect(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long prot)
>>> int pcr;
>>>
>>> /* Is mprotect making an mmap'ed file executable? */
>>> - if (!vma->vm_file || !(prot & PROT_EXEC) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
>>> + if (!(ima_policy_flag & IMA_APPRAISE) || !vma->vm_file ||
>>> + !(prot & PROT_EXEC) || (vma->vm_flags & VM_EXEC))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
>>>
>> Thanks. I test the change, it can resolve the regression.
>
> Thanks! Can I get your "Tested-by" tag?
>
> Mimi
>
Sure.
--
Zhengjun Xing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists