lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=Xt8AdnemnKLgxwkC-W=LWC06OU9x20RszXPLfAvUm9Og@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 07:34:47 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Sandeep Panda <spanda@...eaurora.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
        Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
        Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Check the regmap return
 value when setting a GPIO

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 2:58 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-06-08 10:48:35)
> > The ti_sn_bridge_gpio_set() got the return value of
> > regmap_update_bits() but didn't check it.  The function can't return
> > an error value, but we should at least print a warning if it didn't
> > work.
> >
> > This fixes a compiler warning about setting "ret" but not using it.
> >
> > Fixes: 27ed2b3f22ed ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Export bridge GPIOs to Linux")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > index 1080e4f9df96..526add27dc03 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c
> > @@ -999,6 +999,9 @@ static void ti_sn_bridge_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset,
> >         ret = regmap_update_bits(pdata->regmap, SN_GPIO_IO_REG,
> >                                  BIT(SN_GPIO_OUTPUT_SHIFT + offset),
> >                                  val << (SN_GPIO_OUTPUT_SHIFT + offset));
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               dev_warn(pdata->dev,
> > +                        "Failed to set bridge GPIO %d: %d\n", offset, ret);
>
> GPIO %u because it's unsigned?

Sure.  I'll plan to spin tomorrow in case anyone else has any
feedback.  If any maintainer would prefer me not to spin and would
rather fix this when applying, please shout and I won't send out a v2.

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ