[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZ+8B2hRDrBjA5uB8zneodE53ea9RJn1G33hJSJptShSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2020 22:21:21 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Sandeep Panda <spanda@...eaurora.org>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>,
Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"open list:DRM PANEL DRIVERS" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Don't compile GPIO bits if
not CONFIG_OF_GPIO
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:48 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> The kernel test robot noted that if "OF" is defined (which is needed
> to select DRM_TI_SN65DSI86 at all) but not OF_GPIO that we'd get
> compile failures because some of the members that we access in "struct
> gpio_chip" are only defined "#if defined(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)".
>
> All the GPIO bits in the driver are all nicely separated out. We'll
> guard them with the same "#if defined" that the header has and add a
> little stub function if OF_GPIO is not defined.
>
> Fixes: 27ed2b3f22ed ("drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Export bridge GPIOs to Linux")
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Fair enough,
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists