lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:51:31 +0000
From:   Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To:     "jarod@...hat.com" <jarod@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     "vfalico@...il.com" <vfalico@...il.com>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "andy@...yhouse.net" <andy@...yhouse.net>,
        "steffen.klassert@...unet.com" <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        "j.vosburgh@...il.com" <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
        Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>,
        "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/4] mlx5: become aware of when running as a
 bonding slave

On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 14:59 -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> I've been unable to get my hands on suitable supported hardware to
> date,
> but I believe this ought to be all that is needed to enable the mlx5
> driver to also work with bonding active-backup crypto offload
> passthru.
> 
> CC: Boris Pismenny <borisp@...lanox.com>
> CC: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> CC: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
> CC: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
> CC: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
> CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
> CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> CC: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> index 92eb3bad4acd..72ad6664bd73 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
> @@ -210,6 +210,9 @@ static inline int
> mlx5e_xfrm_validate_state(struct xfrm_state *x)
>  	struct net_device *netdev = x->xso.dev;
>  	struct mlx5e_priv *priv;
>  
> +	if (x->xso.slave_dev)
> +		netdev = x->xso.slave_dev;
> +

Do we really need to repeat this per driver ? 
why not just setup xso.real_dev, in xfrm layer once and for all before
calling device drivers ? 

Device drivers will use xso.real_dev blindly.

Will be useful in the future when you add vlan support, etc..


>  	priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  
>  	if (x->props.aalgo != SADB_AALG_NONE) {
> @@ -291,6 +294,9 @@ static int mlx5e_xfrm_add_state(struct xfrm_state
> *x)
>  	unsigned int sa_handle;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	if (x->xso.slave_dev)
> +		netdev = x->xso.slave_dev;
> +
>  	priv = netdev_priv(netdev);
>  
>  	err = mlx5e_xfrm_validate_state(x);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists