[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200612072901.14388-1-ludovic.barre@st.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:29:01 +0200
From: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip/stm32: fix return value of stm32_exti_h_set_affinity
exti hardware point of view, there is no specific action on set_affinity.
So the affinity must be forwarded to parent if there is a
descendent irqchips, otherwise just return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>
---
drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
index faa8482c8246..1a0a60ee7140 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-stm32-exti.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int stm32_exti_h_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
if (d->parent_data->chip)
return irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(d, dest, force);
- return -EINVAL;
+ return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
}
static int __maybe_unused stm32_exti_h_suspend(void)
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists