[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <acd53f06-845b-75e0-24c5-40c751d12945@web.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:37:33 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
opensource.kernel@...o.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix memory leak in msm_submitqueue_create()
> In fucntin msm_submitqueue_create, the queue is a local
> variable, in return -EINVAL branch, queue didn`t add to ctx`s
> list yet, and also didn`t kfree, this maybe bring in potential
> memleak.
I suggest to improve also this change description.
How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
Release the GPU submission queue object after an input parameter validation failed.
Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b791d1bdf9212d944d749a5c7ff6febdba241771#n183
How do you think about to reorder any statements for this function implementation?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists