linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix memory leak in msm_submitqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:02:05 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        opensource.kernel@...o.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/msm: Fix memory leak in msm_submitqueue_create()

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:37:33AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > In fucntin msm_submitqueue_create, the queue is a local
> > variable, in return -EINVAL branch, queue didn`t add to ctx`s
> > list yet, and also didn`t kfree, this maybe bring in potential
> > memleak.
> 
> I suggest to improve also this change description.
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
> 
>    Release the GPU submission queue object after an input parameter validation failed.
> 
> 
> Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=b791d1bdf9212d944d749a5c7ff6febdba241771#n183
> 
> 
> How do you think about to reorder any statements for this function implementation?
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot