[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200612132656.GQ2531@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 15:26:56 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Matt Helsley <mhelsley@...are.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v4 18/32] objtool: mcount: Move nop_mcount()
On Tue, Jun 02, 2020 at 12:50:11PM -0700, Matt Helsley wrote:
> +static int nop_mcount(struct section * const rels,
> + const char *const txtname)
> +{
> + struct reloc *reloc;
> + struct section *txts = find_section_by_index(lf, rels->sh.sh_info);
> + unsigned mcountsym = 0;
> + int once = 0;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(reloc, &rels->reloc_list, list) {
> + int ret = -1;
> +
> + if (!mcountsym)
> + mcountsym = get_mcountsym(reloc);
> +
> + if (mcountsym == GELF_R_INFO(reloc->sym->idx, reloc->type) && !is_fake_mcount(reloc)) {
This makes no sense to me; why not have mcountsym be a 'struct symbol
*' and have get_mcountsym() return one of those.
if (reloc->sym == mcountsym && ... )
is much nicer, no?
> + if (make_nop) {
> + ret = make_nop(txts, reloc->offset);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -1;
> + }
> + if (warn_on_notrace_sect && !once) {
> + printf("Section %s has mcount callers being ignored\n",
> + txtname);
> + once = 1;
> + /* just warn? */
> + if (!make_nop)
> + return 0;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * If we successfully removed the mcount, mark the relocation
> + * as a nop (don't do anything with it).
> + */
> + if (!ret) {
> + reloc->type = rel_type_nop;
> + rels->changed = true;
I have an elf_write_rela(), I'll make sure to Cc you.
> + }
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists