[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200612163009.GN5396@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2020 17:30:09 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
robh@...nel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] ASoC: tas2562: Update shutdown GPIO property
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:27:04AM -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Well should we then just revert back to the non-standard name and just fix
> up the code?
> Or should we support both properties?
Either option is fine for me, supporting both is a little nicer.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists