lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e14980e3-7c6e-fbc2-2b1f-f673ddb0c4e1@nvidia.com>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 12:48:55 -0700
From:   Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hmm: remove redundant check non_swap_entry()


On 6/12/20 12:33 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 12:26:18PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>> In zap_pte_range(), the check for non_swap_entry() and
>> is_device_private_entry() is redundant since the latter is a subset of the
>> former. Remove the redundant check to simplify the code and for clarity.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
>>
>> This is based on the current linux tree and is intended for Andrew's mm
>> tree. There is no rush so it could go into 5.9 but I think it is safe
>> enough to go into an rc after the patch is reviewed.
> 
> Probably shouldn't mark it as mm/hmm if Andrew is going to pick it

OK, I'll mark it as just mm: if I need to repost.

> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
> 
> Jason
> 

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ