linux-kernel - Re: [v2] proc/fd: Remove unnecessary variable initialisations in seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200612194901.GD23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jun 2020 20:49:01 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Kaitao Cheng <pilgrimtao@...il.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] proc/fd: Remove unnecessary variable initialisations in
 seq_show()

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 09:00:14PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> I suggest to take another look at published software development activities.
> >
> > Do you collateral evolution in the twenty?
> 
> Evolutions and software refactorings are just happening.
> Can we continue to clarify the concrete programming items
> also for a more constructive review of this patch variant?

The really shocking part is that apparently this thing is _not_ a bot -
according to the people who'd been unfortunate enough to meet it, it's
hosted by wetware and behaviour is the same face-to-face...

I'm still not convinced that it's not a sociology student collecting
PhD material, though - something around strong programme crowd,
with their religious avoidance of learning the subject matter, lest
it taints their "research"...