[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200614071335.GB2629255@kroah.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 09:13:35 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: weifenghai <zzuedu2000@....com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix code style in css_task_iter_next_css_set()
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 09:56:26PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > One line similar code before in this function
>
> I suggest to improve the commit message.
> How do you think about a wording variant like the following?
>
> Combine two assignments for the variable ālā into one statement.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi,
This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.
Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.
Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists