lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0200 From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/entry: KCSAN/KASAN/UBSAN vs noinstr On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 12:25, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote: > > > > Hai, > > > > Here's the remaining few patches to make KCSAN/KASAN and UBSAN work with noinstr. > > Thanks for assembling the series! > > For where it's missing (1,2,3 and last one): > > Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> Where was this series supposed to go? I can't find it on any tree yet. How urgent is this? Boot-test seems fine without this, but likely doesn't hit the corner cases. Syzbot will likely find them, and if we noticeably end up breaking various sanitizers without this, I'd consider this urgent. Thanks, -- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists