[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANpmjNP2ayM6Oehw08yFM4+5xTjXWcCT7P3u7FL=cCMxFJNkXw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:07:34 +0200
From: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] x86/entry: KCSAN/KASAN/UBSAN vs noinstr
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 13:01, Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 at 12:25, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hai,
> >
> > Here's the remaining few patches to make KCSAN/KASAN and UBSAN work with noinstr.
>
> Thanks for assembling the series!
>
> For where it's missing (1,2,3 and last one):
>
> Acked-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Where was this series supposed to go? I can't find it on any tree yet.
How urgent is this? Boot-test seems fine without this, but likely
doesn't hit the corner cases. Syzbot will likely find them, and if we
noticeably end up breaking various sanitizers without this, I'd
consider this urgent.
Thanks,
-- Marco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists