[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200615120449.GA28317@oc3871087118.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 14:04:50 +0200
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] bitmap: Add test for bitmap_cut()
On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:46:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 12:41:55PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 07:40:54PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > Inspired by an original patch from Yury Norov: introduce a test for
> > > bitmap_cut() that also makes sure functionality is as described for
> > > partially overlapping src and dst.
> >
> > Taking into account recent fixes for BE 64-bit, do we have test cases for a such?
>
> It might be enough to have only these, but perhaps s390 guys can help?
>
> Alexander, can you apply this patch (w/o the first one, which is suppose to
> fix) and confirm that you have test case failure, followed by applying first
> one and confirm a fix?
This failure goes away when patch #1 is applied:
test_bitmap: [lib/test_bitmap.c:666] bitmaps contents differ: expected "0-16,18-19,21,24,26-27,29", got "1,3-4,6,9,11-12,14,16,18-19,21,24,26-27,29"
Thus, I confirm.
[...]
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists