lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200615120844.GL4447@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 13:08:44 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] genirq: Do not test disabled IRQs with DEBUG_SHIRQ

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:07:19AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Testing events during freeing of disabled shared interrupts
> (CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ) leads to false positives.  The driver disabled
> interrupts on purpose to be sure that they will not fire during device
> removal.

Surely the whole issue with shared IRQs that's being tested for here is
that when the interrupt is shared some other device connected to the
same interrupt line may trigger an interrupt regardless of what's going
on with this device?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ