linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-simple: fix connector type for LogicPD Type28 Display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHCN7x+=xjFTy6J4Ej61U2jXTez2rLrt=KtEOzbvV7Tzq6XoPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:53:45 -0500
From:   Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com>
To:     Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Cc:     DRI mailing list <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Adam Ford-BE <aford@...conembedded.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
        Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/panel-simple: fix connector type for LogicPD Type28 Display

On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 9:46 AM Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 10:19 AM Adam Ford <aford173@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > The LogicPD Type28 display used by several Logic PD products has not
> > worked since v5.5.
>
> Maybe you could tell which commit exactly and then put a Fixes tag?

I honestly don't know.  I reached out to the omap mailing list,
because I noted this issue. Tomi V from TI responded with a link that
he posted which fixes this for another display.

https://www.mail-archive.com/dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org/msg312208.html

I tested that patch and it worked for a different LCD, so I did the
same thing to the Logic PD Type 28 display as well.

My patch and commit message were modeled after his, and his commit
CC's stable with a note about being required for v5.5+

I added him to the CC list, so maybe he knows which hash needs to be
referenced from a fixes tag.  I was hoping to not have to go back and
bisect if it's not required, but I will if necessary.


adam