[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200616102659.GK4447@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:26:59 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
Cc: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com"
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 RFC 1/2] spi: introduce fallback to pio
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:13:08AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> On 2020/06/16 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I'd just make this a generic flag for failures before we start interacting with the
> > hardware rather than specifically this one error case. Otherwise this looks
> > fine.
> So rename to SPI_TRANS_DMA_FAIL? I think at least DMA is MUST for fallback
> case...
This is not purely for DMA, it's just about the failure having occurred
before the transfer started. How about _FAIL_NO_START?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists