[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB66381A584159BEF5450B4CCD899D0@VE1PR04MB6638.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2020 12:29:57 +0000
From: Robin Gong <yibin.gong@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>,
"matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com"
<matthias.schiffer@...tq-group.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v1 RFC 1/2] spi: introduce fallback to pio
On 2020/06/16 18:27 Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:13:08AM +0000, Robin Gong wrote:
> > So rename to SPI_TRANS_DMA_FAIL? I think at least DMA is MUST for
> > fallback case...
>
> This is not purely for DMA, it's just about the failure having occurred before the
> transfer started. How about _FAIL_NO_START?
Okay, I'll use SPI_TRANS_FAIL_NO_START in v2. Thanks Mark for your kind support :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists