[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8AOBA2pM0CXpdEO7NS1fdK8Nv=4gRDQ384v6mV9ip6Ke2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 14:47:43 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>, Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ASoC: fsl_spdif: Add support for imx6sx platform
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 2:27 PM Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:30:17PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > The one difference on imx6sx platform is that the root clock
> > is shared with ASRC module, so we add a new flags
> > "shared_root_clock" which means the root clock is independent,
>
> "shared" means "not independent", against "independent" ;)
>
> > then we will not do the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to avoid
> > impact ASRC module usage.
> >
> > As add a new flags, we include the soc specific data struct.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>
>
> Can add this once fixing the remaining comments:
>
> Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>
>
> > +static inline bool fsl_spdif_can_set_clk_rate(struct fsl_spdif_priv *spdif,
> > + int clk)
>
> Can actually merge into single line as kernel has 100-character
> limit now, though 80-char is still preferable for a good coding
> style. But I think this one wouldn't be too bad at all.
>
> > @@ -421,7 +456,7 @@ static int spdif_set_sample_rate(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> > sysclk_df = spdif_priv->sysclk_df[rate];
> >
> > /* Don't mess up the clocks from other modules */
>
> We can drop this comments now as it's out-of-date and the name of
> the new helper function is straightforward enough.
>
ok, will send v3.
best regards
wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists