lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b41bfead-7b73-be78-c63f-79a0a7e23b2a@arm.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:35:58 +0100
From:   Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>
Cc:     David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] drm/panfrost: Reduce the amount of logs on deferred
 probe

On 17/06/2020 15:15, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 04:43:34PM -0400, Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@...labora.com>
>>
>> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:05:44PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> There is no point to print deferred probe (and its failures to get
>>> resources) as an error.  Also there is no need to print regulator errors
>>> twice.
>>>
>>> In case of multiple probe tries this would pollute the dmesg.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>> Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> 1. Rebase
>>> 2. Add Steven's review
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> 1. Remove second error message from calling panfrost_regulator_init()
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.c | 8 ++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
> 
> Hi Rob, Tomeu and Steven,
> 
> You're listed as maintainers for panfrost. Is anyone going to pick this
> up?

I'm only a reviewer so I've been leaving it for Rob or Tomeu, but I can 
pick it up if Rob/Tomeu are happy for me to do that.

> Maybe I sent it to wrong mailing list or forgot about anything?

No, there's actually a few Panfrost commits waiting, it was on my todo 
list to ask if Rob/Tomeu needed some help with merging patches.

Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ