[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <25b48bfa-07ef-c6c8-c4c9-61c213e22f66@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 22:38:06 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 18 (fs/io_uring)
On 6/17/20 9:15 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> News: there will be no linux-next release tomorrow.
>
> Changes since 20200617:
>
when CONFIG_BLOCK is not set/enabled:
../fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_async_task_func':
../fs/io_uring.c:4559:7: error: implicit declaration of function 'io_sq_thread_acquire_mm'; did you mean 'atomic_read_acquire'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
if (io_sq_thread_acquire_mm(ctx, req)) {
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
atomic_read_acquire
../fs/io_uring.c: In function 'io_sq_thread':
../fs/io_uring.c:6268:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'io_sq_thread_drop_mm'; did you mean 'io_sq_thread'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
io_sq_thread_drop_mm(ctx);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
io_sq_thread
--
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists