linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.7 323/376] software node: implement software_node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200619141725.619042745@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:34:01 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.7 323/376] software node: implement software_node_unregister()

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

commit 46d26819a5056f4831649c5887ad5c71a16d86f7 upstream.

Sometimes it is better to unregister individual nodes instead of trying
to do them all at once with software_node_unregister_nodes(), so create
software_node_unregister() so that you can unregister them one at a
time.

This is especially important when creating nodes in a hierarchy, with
parent -> children representations.  Children always need to be removed
before a parent is, as the swnode logic assumes this is going to be the
case.

Fix up the lib/test_printf.c fwnode_pointer() test which to use this new
function as it had the problem of tearing things down in the backwards
order.

Fixes: f1ce39df508d ("lib/test_printf: Add tests for %pfw printk modifier")
Cc: stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Reviewed-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200524153041.2361-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/base/swnode.c    |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++------
 include/linux/property.h |    1 +
 lib/test_printf.c        |    4 +++-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/base/swnode.c
+++ b/drivers/base/swnode.c
@@ -712,17 +712,18 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register
  * @nodes: Zero terminated array of software nodes to be unregistered
  *
  * Unregister multiple software nodes at once.
+ *
+ * NOTE: Be careful using this call if the nodes had parent pointers set up in
+ * them before registering.  If so, it is wiser to remove the nodes
+ * individually, in the correct order (child before parent) instead of relying
+ * on the sequential order of the list of nodes in the array.
  */
 void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes)
 {
-	struct swnode *swnode;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++) {
-		swnode = software_node_to_swnode(&nodes[i]);
-		if (swnode)
-			fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
-	}
+	for (i = 0; nodes[i].name; i++)
+		software_node_unregister(&nodes[i]);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister_nodes);
 
@@ -741,6 +742,20 @@ int software_node_register(const struct
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_register);
 
+/**
+ * software_node_unregister - Unregister static software node
+ * @node: The software node to be unregistered
+ */
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node)
+{
+	struct swnode *swnode;
+
+	swnode = software_node_to_swnode(node);
+	if (swnode)
+		fwnode_remove_software_node(&swnode->fwnode);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(software_node_unregister);
+
 struct fwnode_handle *
 fwnode_create_software_node(const struct property_entry *properties,
 			    const struct fwnode_handle *parent)
--- a/include/linux/property.h
+++ b/include/linux/property.h
@@ -441,6 +441,7 @@ int software_node_register_nodes(const s
 void software_node_unregister_nodes(const struct software_node *nodes);
 
 int software_node_register(const struct software_node *node);
+void software_node_unregister(const struct software_node *node);
 
 int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action);
 
--- a/lib/test_printf.c
+++ b/lib/test_printf.c
@@ -637,7 +637,9 @@ static void __init fwnode_pointer(void)
 	test(second_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[1]));
 	test(third_name, "%pfwP", software_node_fwnode(&softnodes[2]));
 
-	software_node_unregister_nodes(softnodes);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[2]);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[1]);
+	software_node_unregister(&softnodes[0]);
 }
 
 static void __init