linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 7/8] scsi: storvsc: Introduce the per-storvsc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200619161813.GA1596681@andrea>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 18:18:13 +0200
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To:     Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc:     "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/8] scsi: storvsc: Introduce the per-storvsc_device
 spinlock

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 04:01:36PM +0000, Wei Liu wrote:
> Cc SCSI maintainers
> 
> This patch should go via the hyperv tree because a later patch is
> dependent on it. It requires and ack from SCSI maintainers though.

Right.  Sorry for the Cc: omission...  ;-/

SCSI maintainers, please let me know if you prefer me to send you a new
series with this patch (7/8) and the later/dependent hyperv patch (8/8).

(1-6/8 of this series are hyperv-specific only and have been applied to
the hyperv tree, so this would only 7-8/8 of this series out.)

Thanks,

  Andrea