linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/22] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.txt: convert to ReST format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:13:29 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.txt: convert to
 ReST format

On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:50:23 +0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:

[CC += Steve]

> - Just like some media documents, this file is dual licensed
>   with GPL and GFDL. As right now the GFDL SPDX definition is
>   bogus (as it doesn't tell anything about invariant parts),
>   let's not use SPDX here. Let's use, instead, the same test
>   as we have on media.

The dual-licensing really can't be expressed with an SPDX tag?  Because...

[...]

> +.. This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> +.. of the GPL 2.0 or the GFDL 1.2+ license, at your option. Note that this
> +.. dual licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> +.. whole.
> +..
> +.. a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> +..    modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> +..    published by the Free Software Foundation version 2 of
> +..    the License.
> +..
> +..    This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +..    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +..    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +..    GNU General Public License for more details.
> +..
> +.. Or, alternatively,
> +..
> +.. b) Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
> +..    document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
> +..    Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software
> +..    Foundation, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts
> +..    and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is available at
> +..    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.2.html
> +..
> +.. TODO: replace it to GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-or-later WITH no-invariant-sections

...adding all that boilerplate is kind of a bummer.

At a minimum I'd want an ack from Steve (who wasn't copied) before
applying this, but it would be better to add a bit more SPDX
infrastructure to express this if possible.

Thanks,

jon