linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 18/22] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.txt: convert to ReST format

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 19 Jun 2020 16:41:14 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/22] docs: trace: ring-buffer-design.txt: convert to
 ReST format

On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:13:29 -0600
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Jun 2020 08:50:23 +0200
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> [CC += Steve]

Thanks.

> 
> > - Just like some media documents, this file is dual licensed
> >   with GPL and GFDL. As right now the GFDL SPDX definition is
> >   bogus (as it doesn't tell anything about invariant parts),
> >   let's not use SPDX here. Let's use, instead, the same test
> >   as we have on media.  
> 
> The dual-licensing really can't be expressed with an SPDX tag?  Because...

A SPDX dual license should be possible, as it's used for GPL and BSD in
several locations.

> 
> [...]
> 
> > +.. This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> > +.. of the GPL 2.0 or the GFDL 1.2+ license, at your option. Note that this

And I never said GFDL 1.2+

 Copyright 2009 Red Hat Inc.                                                                                                                                                                  
-   Author:   Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>                                                                                                                                            
-  License:   The GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2                                                                                                                                 
-               (dual licensed under the GPL v2)                                                                                                                                              
-Reviewers:   Mathieu Desnoyers, Huang Ying, Hidetoshi Seto,

There is no "+" sign here.


> > +.. dual licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> > +.. whole.
> > +..
> > +.. a) This file is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > +..    modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as
> > +..    published by the Free Software Foundation version 2 of
> > +..    the License.
> > +..
> > +..    This file is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > +..    but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > +..    MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> > +..    GNU General Public License for more details.
> > +..
> > +.. Or, alternatively,
> > +..
> > +.. b) Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this
> > +..    document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License,
> > +..    Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software
> > +..    Foundation, with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts
> > +..    and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is available at
> > +..    https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/fdl-1.2.html
> > +..
> > +.. TODO: replace it to GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2-or-later WITH no-invariant-sections  

  "GPL-2.0 OR GFDL-1.2"

-- Steve

> 
> ...adding all that boilerplate is kind of a bummer.
> 
> At a minimum I'd want an ack from Steve (who wasn't copied) before
> applying this, but it would be better to add a bit more SPDX
> infrastructure to express this if possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon