linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/11] arm64: dts: renesas: Add HiHope RZ/G2N Rev2.0/3.0/4.0 board with idk-1110wr display

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUyfv7jQ=kmWRy-zehrgLhE=5=8Pg50seAqnTWV3yKziA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:56:03 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] arm64: dts: renesas: Add HiHope RZ/G2N
 Rev2.0/3.0/4.0 board with idk-1110wr display

Hi Prabhakar,

On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 8:42 PM Lad Prabhakar
<prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> The HiHope RZ/G2N variants are advertised as compatible with panel
> idk-1110wr from Advantech, however the panel isn't sold alongside the
> board. New dts's, enabling the lvds node to get the panel to work with
> all the HiHope RZ/G2N variants.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Marian-Cristian Rotariu <marian-cristian.rotariu.rb@...renesas.com>

Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>

> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/Makefile
> @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n.dtb \
>                                r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-ex.dtb \
>                                r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774B1) += r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb \
> +                              r8a774b1-hihope-rzg2n-rev2-ex-idk-1110wr.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_R8A774C0) += r8a774c0-cat874.dtb r8a774c0-ek874.dtb \
>                                r8a774c0-ek874-idk-2121wr.dtb \
>                                r8a774c0-ek874-mipi-2.1.dtb

BTW, the grouping may be more obvious if there would be only a single
"dtb-$(CONFIG_<FOO>)" for each value of <FOO>.
But as that is a pre-existing issue, perhaps I'll just fix all of them
after applying
(the next revision of) this series.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds