| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200622125649.GC576871@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:56:49 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: mingo@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
paulmck@...nel.org, frederic@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 1/5] sched: Fix ttwu() race
*sigh*, this one should actually build and I got a smatch report that
there's an uninitizlied usage of @cpu, so I shuffled that around a bit.
---
Subject: sched: Fix ttwu() race
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 12:01:23 +0200
Paul reported rcutorture occasionally hitting a NULL deref:
sched_ttwu_pending()
ttwu_do_wakeup()
check_preempt_curr() := check_preempt_wakeup()
find_matching_se()
is_same_group()
if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq) <-- *BOOM*
Debugging showed that this only appears to happen when we take the new
code-path from commit:
2ebb17717550 ("sched/core: Offload wakee task activation if it the wakee is descheduling")
and only when @cpu == smp_processor_id(). Something which should not
be possible, because p->on_cpu can only be true for remote tasks.
Similarly, without the new code-path from commit:
c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
this would've unconditionally hit:
smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
and if: 'cpu == smp_processor_id() && p->on_cpu' is possible, this
would result in an instant live-lock (with IRQs disabled), something
that hasn't been reported.
The NULL deref can be explained however if the task_cpu(p) load at the
beginning of try_to_wake_up() returns an old value, and this old value
happens to be smp_processor_id(). Further assume that the p->on_cpu
load accurately returns 1, it really is still running, just not here.
Then, when we enqueue the task locally, we can crash in exactly the
observed manner because p->se.cfs_rq != rq->cfs_rq, because p's cfs_rq
is from the wrong CPU, therefore we'll iterate into the non-existant
parents and NULL deref.
The closest semi-plausible scenario I've managed to contrive is
somewhat elaborate (then again, actual reproduction takes many CPU
hours of rcutorture, so it can't be anything obvious):
X->cpu = 1
rq(1)->curr = X
CPU0 CPU1 CPU2
// switch away from X
LOCK rq(1)->lock
smp_mb__after_spinlock
dequeue_task(X)
X->on_rq = 9
switch_to(Z)
X->on_cpu = 0
UNLOCK rq(1)->lock
// migrate X to cpu 0
LOCK rq(1)->lock
dequeue_task(X)
set_task_cpu(X, 0)
X->cpu = 0
UNLOCK rq(1)->lock
LOCK rq(0)->lock
enqueue_task(X)
X->on_rq = 1
UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
// switch to X
LOCK rq(0)->lock
smp_mb__after_spinlock
switch_to(X)
X->on_cpu = 1
UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
// X goes sleep
X->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
smp_mb(); // wake X
ttwu()
LOCK X->pi_lock
smp_mb__after_spinlock
if (p->state)
cpu = X->cpu; // =? 1
smp_rmb()
// X calls schedule()
LOCK rq(0)->lock
smp_mb__after_spinlock
dequeue_task(X)
X->on_rq = 0
if (p->on_rq)
smp_rmb();
if (p->on_cpu && ttwu_queue_wakelist(..)) [*]
smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL)
cpu = select_task_rq(X, X->wake_cpu, ...)
if (X->cpu != cpu)
switch_to(Y)
X->on_cpu = 0
UNLOCK rq(0)->lock
However I'm having trouble convincing myself that's actually possible
on x86_64 -- after all, every LOCK implies an smp_mb there, so if ttwu
observes ->state != RUNNING, it must also observe ->cpu != 1.
(Most of the previous ttwu() races were found on very large PowerPC)
Nevertheless, this fully explains the observed failure case.
Fix it by ordering the task_cpu(p) load after the p->on_cpu load,
which is easy since nothing actually uses @cpu before this.
Fixes: c6e7bd7afaeb ("sched/core: Optimize ttwu() spinning on p->on_cpu")
Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2293,8 +2293,15 @@ void sched_ttwu_pending(void *arg)
rq_lock_irqsave(rq, &rf);
update_rq_clock(rq);
- llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry)
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(p, t, llist, wake_entry) {
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(p->on_cpu))
+ smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu, !VAL);
+
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(task_cpu(p) != cpu_of(rq)))
+ set_task_cpu(p, cpu_of(rq));
+
ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, p->sched_remote_wakeup ? WF_MIGRATED : 0, &rf);
+ }
rq_unlock_irqrestore(rq, &rf);
}
@@ -2378,6 +2385,9 @@ static inline bool ttwu_queue_cond(int c
static bool ttwu_queue_wakelist(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int wake_flags)
{
if (sched_feat(TTWU_QUEUE) && ttwu_queue_cond(cpu, wake_flags)) {
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu == smp_processor_id()))
+ return false;
+
sched_clock_cpu(cpu); /* Sync clocks across CPUs */
__ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags);
return true;
@@ -2528,7 +2538,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
goto out;
success = 1;
- cpu = task_cpu(p);
trace_sched_waking(p);
p->state = TASK_RUNNING;
trace_sched_wakeup(p);
@@ -2550,7 +2559,6 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
/* We're going to change ->state: */
success = 1;
- cpu = task_cpu(p);
/*
* Ensure we load p->on_rq _after_ p->state, otherwise it would
@@ -2614,8 +2622,21 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
* which potentially sends an IPI instead of spinning on p->on_cpu to
* let the waker make forward progress. This is safe because IRQs are
* disabled and the IPI will deliver after on_cpu is cleared.
+ *
+ * Ensure we load task_cpu(p) after p->on_cpu:
+ *
+ * set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
+ * STORE p->cpu = @cpu
+ * __schedule() (switch to task 'p')
+ * LOCK rq->lock
+ * smp_mb__after_spin_lock() smp_cond_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu)
+ * STORE p->on_cpu = 1 LOAD p->cpu
+ *
+ * to ensure we observe the correct CPU on which the task is currently
+ * scheduling.
*/
- if (READ_ONCE(p->on_cpu) && ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, cpu, wake_flags | WF_ON_RQ))
+ if (smp_load_acquire(&p->on_cpu) &&
+ ttwu_queue_wakelist(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags | WF_ON_RQ))
goto unlock;
/*
@@ -2635,6 +2656,8 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
psi_ttwu_dequeue(p);
set_task_cpu(p, cpu);
}
+#else
+ cpu = task_cpu(p);
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
ttwu_queue(p, cpu, wake_flags);
@@ -2642,7 +2665,7 @@ try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, un
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags);
out:
if (success)
- ttwu_stat(p, cpu, wake_flags);
+ ttwu_stat(p, task_cpu(p), wake_flags);
preempt_enable();
return success;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists