[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db17d022-a53a-3781-63d4-c38d5cf5b1e4@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:25:52 +0800
From: "Zhengbin (OSKernel)" <zhengbin13@...wei.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
"Navid Emamdoost" <emamd001@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
Stephen McCamant <mccamant@...umn.edu>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>,
<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@....fi>,
Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nbd: Fix memory leak in nbd_add_socket
On 2020/6/20 20:05, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> If we add first socket to nbd, config->socks is malloced but
>> num_connections does not update(nsock's allocation fail), the memory
>> is leaked. Cause in later nbd_config_put(), will only free config->socks
>> when num_connections is not 0.
>>
>> Let nsock's allocation first to avoid this.
> I suggest to improve this change description.
> Can an other wording variant be nicer?
em, how about this?
When adding first socket to nbd, if nsock's allocation fails, config->socks
is malloced but num_connections does not update, memory leak will
occur(Function
nbd_config_put will only free config->socks when num_connections is not 0).
>
>
> …
>> +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c
>> @@ -1037,21 +1037,22 @@ static int nbd_add_socket(struct nbd_device *nbd, unsigned long arg,
>> return -EBUSY;
>> }
>>
>> + nsock = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nbd_sock), GFP_KERNEL);
> Please use the following code variant.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst?id=4333a9b0b67bb4e8bcd91bdd80da80b0ec151162#n854
>
> + nsock = kzalloc(sizeof(*nsock), GFP_KERNEL);
>
>
> …
>> if (!socks) {
>> sockfd_put(sock);
>> + kfree(nsock);
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
> Please take another software design possibility into account.
>
> if (!socks) {
> - sockfd_put(sock);
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + kfree(nsock);
> + goto put_socket;
> }
>
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists