[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3eab889e-75b6-6287-a668-a2eaa509834c@web.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:07:02 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_mqs: Fix unchecked return value for
clk_prepare_enable
> Fix unchecked return value for clk_prepare_enable.
>
> And because clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare should
> check input clock parameter is NULL or not, then we don't need
> to check it before calling the function.
I propose to split the adjustment of two function implementations
into separate update steps for a small patch series.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=625d3449788f85569096780592549d0340e9c0c7#n138
I suggest to improve the change descriptions accordingly.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists