[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA+D8ANyeND269US_e3VZg-pOVJ6Beu54C2SL19h6y+ut03OYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:13:30 +0800
From: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@...il.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
Linux-ALSA <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Xiubo Li <Xiubo.Lee@...il.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_mqs: Fix unchecked return value for clk_prepare_enable
On Tue, Jun 23, 2020 at 12:08 AM Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote:
>
> > Fix unchecked return value for clk_prepare_enable.
> >
> > And because clk_prepare_enable and clk_disable_unprepare should
> > check input clock parameter is NULL or not, then we don't need
> > to check it before calling the function.
>
> I propose to split the adjustment of two function implementations
> into separate update steps for a small patch series.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=625d3449788f85569096780592549d0340e9c0c7#n138
>
> I suggest to improve the change descriptions accordingly.
ok, will update the patches in v2.
best regards
wang shengjiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists