linux-kernel - [PATCH] cpufreq: cppc: Reorder code and remove apply_hisi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Jun 2020 10:45:11 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: cppc: Reorder code and remove apply_hisi_workaround variable

With the current approach we have an extra check in the
cppc_cpufreq_get_rate() callback, which checks if hisilicon's get rate
implementation should be used instead. While it works fine, the approach
isn't very straight forward, over that we have an extra check in the
routine.

Rearrange code and update the cpufreq driver's get() callback pointer
directly for the hisilicon case. This gets the extra variable is removed
and the extra check isn't required anymore as well.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
Xiongfeng Wang, will it be possible for you to give this a try as I
can't really test it locally.

 drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
index 257d726a4456..03a21daddbec 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@ struct cppc_workaround_oem_info {
 	u32 oem_revision;
 };
 
-static bool apply_hisi_workaround;
-
 static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = {
 	{
 		.oem_id		= "HISI  ",
@@ -59,50 +57,6 @@ static struct cppc_workaround_oem_info wa_info[] = {
 	}
 };
 
-static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(struct cppc_cpudata *cpu,
-					unsigned int perf);
-
-/*
- * HISI platform does not support delivered performance counter and
- * reference performance counter. It can calculate the performance using the
- * platform specific mechanism. We reuse the desired performance register to
- * store the real performance calculated by the platform.
- */
-static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum)
-{
-	struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
-	u64 desired_perf;
-	int ret;
-
-	ret = cppc_get_desired_perf(cpunum, &desired_perf);
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return -EIO;
-
-	return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, desired_perf);
-}
-
-static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
-{
-	struct acpi_table_header *tbl;
-	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
-	int i;
-
-	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PCCT, 0, &tbl);
-	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !tbl)
-		return;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_info); i++) {
-		if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) &&
-		    !memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
-		    wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) {
-			apply_hisi_workaround = true;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	acpi_put_table(tbl);
-}
-
 /* Callback function used to retrieve the max frequency from DMI */
 static void cppc_find_dmi_mhz(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *private)
 {
@@ -402,9 +356,6 @@ static unsigned int cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum)
 	struct cppc_cpudata *cpu = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
 	int ret;
 
-	if (apply_hisi_workaround)
-		return hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(cpunum);
-
 	ret = cppc_get_perf_ctrs(cpunum, &fb_ctrs_t0);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -455,6 +406,48 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver cppc_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.name = "cppc_cpufreq",
 };
 
+/*
+ * HISI platform does not support delivered performance counter and
+ * reference performance counter. It can calculate the performance using the
+ * platform specific mechanism. We reuse the desired performance register to
+ * store the real performance calculated by the platform.
+ */
+static unsigned int hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate(unsigned int cpunum)
+{
+	struct cppc_cpudata *cpudata = all_cpu_data[cpunum];
+	u64 desired_perf;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = cppc_get_desired_perf(cpunum, &desired_perf);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return -EIO;
+
+	return cppc_cpufreq_perf_to_khz(cpudata, desired_perf);
+}
+
+static void cppc_check_hisi_workaround(void)
+{
+	struct acpi_table_header *tbl;
+	acpi_status status = AE_OK;
+	int i;
+
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PCCT, 0, &tbl);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || !tbl)
+		return;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(wa_info); i++) {
+		if (!memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_id, tbl->oem_id, ACPI_OEM_ID_SIZE) &&
+		    !memcmp(wa_info[i].oem_table_id, tbl->oem_table_id, ACPI_OEM_TABLE_ID_SIZE) &&
+		    wa_info[i].oem_revision == tbl->oem_revision) {
+			/* Overwrite the get() callback */
+			cppc_cpufreq_driver.get = hisi_cppc_cpufreq_get_rate;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	acpi_put_table(tbl);
+}
+
 static int __init cppc_cpufreq_init(void)
 {
 	int i, ret = 0;
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af