linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match devices with the correct of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 17:53:19 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:     andy.shevchenko@...il.com, michael@...le.cc, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux@...ck-us.net,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, robin.murphy@....com,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mfd: core: Make a best effort attempt to match
 devices with the correct of_nodes

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020, Frank Rowand wrote:

> On 2020-06-22 03:09, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020, Lee Jones wrote:
> > 
> >> Currently, when a child platform device (sometimes referred to as a
> >> sub-device) is registered via the Multi-Functional Device (MFD) API,
> >> the framework attempts to match the newly registered platform device
> >> with its associated Device Tree (OF) node.  Until now, the device has
> >> been allocated the first node found with an identical OF compatible
> >> string.  Unfortunately, if there are, say for example '3' devices
> >> which are to be handled by the same driver and therefore have the same
> >> compatible string, each of them will be allocated a pointer to the
> >> *first* node.
> > 
> > Any more reviews/comments before I apply this?
> > 
> 
> Yes, outstanding issues, so please do not apply.
> 
> Shortly after you sent this email, you sent a reply to one of my
> earlier emails in this thread.  I have replied to that email,
> so we still have an ongoing conversation where we are trying
> to resolve my understanding of the problem and whether the
> solution is appropriate.

Happy to discuss whatever issues you're having.

Looks like the ball is in your court. :)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog