[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJXV-Ujx2zgXxiYWOED2CYz_89aAiUUiqak1JbtNJKgSFg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 18:54:06 +0200
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Navid Emamdoost <emamd001@....edu>,
Qiushi Wu <wu000273@....edu>, Kangjie Lu <kjlu@....edu>,
mccamant@...umn.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] gpio: rcar: handle pm_runtime_get_sync failure case
śr., 17 cze 2020 o 09:43 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 9:40 AM Navid Emamdoost
> <navid.emamdoost@...il.com> wrote:
> > Calling pm_runtime_get_sync increments the counter even in case of
> > failure, causing incorrect ref count. Call pm_runtime_put if
> > pm_runtime_get_sync fails.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@...il.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
>
Is this stable material?
Bart
Powered by blists - more mailing lists