lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622171106.GA192855@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:11:06 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: f2fs: fix a broken table

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 07:39:07AM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> Commit ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2") added an
> entry to the massive option table in Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt.
> The option was too wide for the formatting of the table, though, leading to
> a verbose and ugly docs-build warning starting with:
> 
>     Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst:229: WARNING: Malformed table.
>     Text in column margin in table line 126.
> 
> Fixing this requires formatting the whole table; let's hear it for Emacs
> query-replace-regexp.  No changes were made to the actual text.
> 
> Fixes: ed318a6cc0b6 ("fscrypt: support test_dummy_encryption=v2")
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
> ---
>  Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.rst | 312 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 156 insertions(+), 156 deletions(-)
> 

Someone already sent out a fix for this:
https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-doc/52f851cb5c9fd2ecae97deec7e168e66b8c295c3.1591137229.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/

Is it intentional that you're sending out a different fix rather than applying
that one?

- Eric

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ