linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] docs: f2fs: fix a broken table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200622112209.71990f9c@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jun 2020 11:22:09 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: f2fs: fix a broken table

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 10:11:06 -0700
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> wrote:

> Someone already sent out a fix for this:
> https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-doc/52f851cb5c9fd2ecae97deec7e168e66b8c295c3.1591137229.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org/
> 
> Is it intentional that you're sending out a different fix rather than applying
> that one?

It wasn't, actually, I'm just finding myself more than usually challenged
these days.

That said, removing the table entirely seems ... excessive.  It's not
terrible the way it is, or we could make it:

	test_dummy_encryption[=%s]

if we really want to.

jon