[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200622172233.GA2874652@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:22:33 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To: Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>
Cc: nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] nouveau/hmm: fault one page at a time
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 02:56:41PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
> The SVM page fault handler groups faults into a range of contiguous
> virtual addresses and requests hmm_range_fault() to populate and
> return the page frame number of system memory mapped by the CPU.
> In preparation for supporting large pages to be mapped by the GPU,
> process faults one page at a time. In addition, use the hmm_range
> default_flags to fix a corner case where the input hmm_pfns array
> is not reinitialized after hmm_range_fault() returns -EBUSY and must
> be called again.
Are you sure? hmm_range_fault is pretty expensive per call..
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists