[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200623154402.jfv5yhhrsbx7toes@e107158-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 16:44:03 +0100
From: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fs <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default
boost value
Hi Vincent
On 06/11/20 14:01, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 12:24, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> wrote:
[...]
> > > Strange because I have been able to trace them.
> >
> > On your arm platform? I can certainly see them on x86.
>
> yes on my arm platform
Sorry for not getting back to you earlier but I have tried several things and
shared my results, which you were CCed into all of them.
I have posted a patch that protects uclamp with a static key, mind trying it on
your platform to see if it helps you too?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200619172011.5810-1-qais.yousef@arm.com/
Thanks
--
Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists