[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBfFkmBRP+6vZaX9sEK+4ABpJrp2qZj18LKzu2t+Q=gGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:45:01 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fs <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/uclamp: Add a new sysctl to control RT default
boost value
Hi Qais,
On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 at 17:44, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> wrote:
>
> Hi Vincent
>
> On 06/11/20 14:01, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 12:24, Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > Strange because I have been able to trace them.
> > >
> > > On your arm platform? I can certainly see them on x86.
> >
> > yes on my arm platform
>
> Sorry for not getting back to you earlier but I have tried several things and
> shared my results, which you were CCed into all of them.
>
> I have posted a patch that protects uclamp with a static key, mind trying it on
> your platform to see if it helps you too?
I have run some tests with your latest patchset and will reply to the
email thread below
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200619172011.5810-1-qais.yousef@arm.com/
>
> Thanks
>
> --
> Qais Yousef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists