[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ca22645-8bf3-008f-fe55-d432f962cac3@web.de>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 10:42:53 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [1/7] irqchip: Fix potential resource leaks
>> Can it helpful to add jump targets so that a bit of exception handling
>> can be better reused at the end of this function?
>
> OK, no problem, I will do it in the v2.
It seems that the software evolution will be continued with another
update suggestion like the following.
[PATCH v3 10/14 RESEND] irqchip/nvic: Fix potential resource leaks
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mips/1592984711-3130-11-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn/
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1263191/
Can it matter to omit the word “potential” from change descriptions
after you detected that specific function calls were missing
in if branches?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists